In every society, at any given point of time, there is a tendency for people to form groups and develop their group identities. Ancient India was no different. Like most other societies, classes arose in ancient India on the basis of vocation of people. Not linked to birth at the beginning, they provided a social hierarchy, depending upon the importance a job for the society.
The class system in ancient India was very different from the caste system seen today, even though the latter arose from the former. Its major characteristic was its linkage with vocation and not with birth or family, as is the case in modern world. But it was not just vocation, it was also duties that were closely linked with it.
The ancient Indian society had innovated a unique class system based on vocation and profession, and attached a great amount of importance with reference to one's duties and values, giving them an importance equivalent to religion.
This system, also known as the 'VARNA' system of social division, divided the society on the basis of one's vocation and profession. Each of the four groups was prescribed duties and values comparable with modern professional. These duties were considered one's 'DHARMA' - the term used equivalently for religion in India, literally meaning duties.
The first class called 'Brahmins' consisted of scholars, saints and teachers, and was considered the highest class in society. Supposed to be the conscience of the society, and the reservoirs and preservers of social knowledge, skills, wisdom and values, Brahmins lead a very austere life, avoided vices like violence, greed, addiction, and glamour.
They did not enjoy political power or wealth, yet, were granted the highest respect in society. Even the King was supposed to respect them, and killing a Brahmin was considered a sin.
The next class was known as 'Kshatriyas'- consisting of warriors, King, the nobles and the soldiers. They were supposed to men of honor, follow a warrior's code of conduct, be respectful to the Brahmins and fight for the protection of weak. They enjoyed political power and use violence when ever required. Thus the duties of this class were different.
The third class was that of 'Vaishyas'- the businessmen and traders, who were expected to generate wealth and be rich. Their goal of life was to accumulate wealth and become rich. In a way they were like modern capitalists, but they were also supposed to respect Brahmins as well as pay their taxes to the King. In a way they were considered custodians of the society's wealth.
The last class was called 'Shudras'- the employees, servants and workers. They were expected to perform the duty assigned with loyalty and honesty. As ordinary laymen, the expectations were also lower from them, and they had more freedom in selecting their life-style.
This class system adopted by the Indians in ancient times is a reflection to the level of their development as well as the need for greater specialization towards work. One’s vocation was considered very important, and everyone was supposed to fulfill his or her duties honestly and sincerely. In fact, the word ‘Dharma’ equivalent to religions of the Western world, literally meant ‘duty’. The concept was that one’s duty depended on one’s station in life, and would be different from time to time and person to person. So, the duties of a daughter were different than those of a mother. Similarly, the duties of a student were different than those of a teacher. Duties also varied with vocation. Thus, while other classes were expected to refrain from indulging in violence, the soldier class, i.e.. kshatriyas were expected to be masters of warfare and be always ready to use violence for the benefit of society.
This ancient class system later got distorted in to ‘caste’ system, when it came to be inherited by birth and hence connected with descent. Today it has all but faded, but its bitter memories still remain and remind us that groupism of any sort within the society is a dangerous phenomenon, and should never be allowed to take strong roots.
Japanese culture has been greatly influenced by the Chinese culture, and yet they are almost as different from each other as any two neighboring countries can ever be. Part of these differences may lie in the self-imposed isolation of Japan till Meiji revolutions, but there are other important reasons too, that make the two societies and cultures vastly different.
Philippines is very strategically located archipelago country. As such it comes with its own set of geographical advantages and disadvantages.
History of our ancestors and the society they lived in was usually remembered by people and kept alive by word of mouth. In most ancient societies including those of Africa, legacies, culture and traditions were passed from one generation to other by this ‘Oral Tradition’.